These casinos were still accessible at our latest check, but the concerns around them are serious enough for us to recommend avoiding them. A casino remaining online does not mean earlier complaints or regulator action have been resolved.

CampeonBet
Still operating: avoidOur score: 2.9/10
We rate it 2.9/10 (Very low): the casino has repeatedly ignored player complaints about confiscated winnings, to the point mediators formally record it as non-responsive.
- Our safety score: 2.9/10 ("Very low"). We explicitly advise players to stay away.
- 18 unresolved player complaints, including confiscated winnings of €5,726 and C$4,250 and an ignored self-exclusion request.
- The casino has a formal no-response record with complaint mediators: 10+ complaints closed because it simply never responds to mediation.
- Operates on an Anjouan (Comoros) group licence shared with sister brand Svenbet (operator: Green Champions Leader SRL).

Svenbet
Still operating: avoidOur score: 2.1/10
We rate it 2.1/10 (Very low): its complaint record is dominated by confiscated winnings, and the brand operates through rotating mirror domains.
- Our safety score: 2.1/10 ("Very low"), with 5 unresolved public complaints: themes include confiscated winnings of €3,000, €1,453 and €1,218 and withheld crypto balances.
- Reachable through rotating mirror domains (svenbet46.com, svenbet21.com live as of August 2026), a pattern that makes accountability and dispute resolution harder.
- Advertises an Anjouan (Comoros) licence, ALSI-202502014-FI1, a group licence shared with sister brand CampeonBet; the licence holder is Green Champions Leader SRL.

RokuBet (formerly Roku Casino)
Still operating: avoidOur score: 2.8/10
Closed, then quietly reopened rebranded as RokuBet; we rate it 2.8/10 (Very low) with blocked-account and delayed-withdrawal complaints on the public record.
- The casino shut down, then reopened rebranded as RokuBet (industry records document the closure and "freshly reopened" relaunch under the new name).
- Our safety score: 2.8/10 ("Very low").
- Complaint record includes blocked accounts holding €8,000, a mishandled self-excluded player (€4,300), and an A$40,000 withdrawal dispute.

1Bet
Still operating: avoidOur score: 0.5/10
We rate it 0.5/10: a €108,000 winnings complaint closed unresolved, account-closure requests ignored and a self-exclusion not applied.
- Our safety score: 0.5/10 ("Very low").
- 17 public complaints on file (checked 14 October 2026): among the heaviest records of disputed, unreturned player money we have reviewed.
- A €108,000 winnings complaint was closed as unresolved after 1Bet failed to provide evidence to mediators; other complaints include ignored account-closure requests, a self-excluded account left open (€2,329 disputed) and delayed withdrawals.
- We judge its terms and conditions unfair (5 issues found); operates under an Anjouan (Comoros) licence (owner: Next Global Era Limited).

PriBet
Still operating: avoidOur score: 0.7/10
We rate it 0.7/10 and firmly advise players to avoid it: the record shows a very high amount of restrained payouts relative to its size.
- Our safety score: 0.7/10 ("Very low"). We firmly advise players to avoid it.
- 6 direct public complaints on file, including unresolved cases.
- the record shows a very high amount of restrained (withheld) payouts relative to the casino's size, plus unfair terms and conditions.

Seven Casino
Still operating: avoidOur score: 1.5/10
We rate it 1.5/10 and strongly advise players to avoid it: 10 direct public complaints sit on the record.
- Our safety score: 1.5/10 ("Very low"). We strongly advise players to avoid it.
- 10 direct public complaints on file.

QBet
Still operating: avoidOur score: 2.5/10
Its operator drew the largest fine in Dutch gambling history (€24.85M, under objection) for illegally serving Dutch players, was banned from targeting Sweden, then deregistered its own company while the site kept operating.
- The Dutch regulator KSA fined operator Novatech Solutions N.V. a record €24,846,000 (decision December 2025, published 10 March 2026) for illegally serving Dutch players via qbet.com and 55bet.com; the operator has objected to the fine.
- Sweden's Spelinspektionen prohibited Novatech from targeting Swedish players on 11 March 2026, naming qbet.com among five domains.
- On 11 March 2026, the day after the fine was published, Novatech deregistered itself from the Curaçao Chamber of Commerce while its sites continued operating; the site now displays Canadian (Tobique) licensing instead.
- The Dutch state lottery has taken the operator to court, calling qbet.com 'the largest illegal gambling site' in the Netherlands (April 2026).

EU9
Still operating: avoidOur score: 2.1/10
we rate it 2.1/10 ("Very low"): an offshore, Southeast-Asia-facing operation with a complaint record and no meaningful player recourse.
- Our safety score: 2.1/10 ("Very low").
- Offshore licensing aimed at Southeast-Asian players. No regulator with real enforcement power stands behind it.

BookOfCasino
Still operating: avoidOur score: 2.5/10
We rate it 2.5/10; public complaints include repeatedly ignored account-closure (responsible-gambling) requests and an account reopened after it was closed.
- Our safety score: 2.5/10 ("Very low").
- 27 public complaints on file, 5 unresolved (checked 14 October 2026), including an account reopened after closure (€700 disputed) and a €5,000 refund claim after a closure request.
- Account-closure requests (a responsible-gambling protection) were repeatedly ignored per the complaint record.
- The terms and conditions are unfair on our reading as well.

Whamoo
Still operating: avoidOur score: 2.6/10
we rate it 2.6/10: complaints include voided, withheld and confiscated winnings, with a very high total value of disputed winnings relative to the casino's size.
- Our safety score: 2.6/10 ("Very low").
- 6 direct public complaints including winnings voided, funds withheld and winnings confiscated.
- the record shows a very high total value of disputed winnings relative to the casino's size, plus unfair terms.

888Starz
Still operating: avoidOur score: 3.0/10
we rate it 3.0/10 ("Very low") with 13 complaints and a very high amount of restrained payouts relative to its size. Not related to 888casino.
- Our safety score: 3.0/10 ("Very low").
- 13 public complaints; a very high amount of restrained payouts relative to size.
- Despite the name, it has no connection to the regulated 888casino brand.

Gratorama
Still operating: avoidOur score: 3.1/10
We rate it 3.1/10 over player-unfriendly terms and a €500-a-month withdrawal cap; sister brand of Winorama.
- Our safety score: 3.1/10 ("Very low").
- Its terms treat common bonus strategies and low-risk play as grounds to confiscate winnings.
- Withdrawals are capped at €500 a month, so a large win takes months to cash out.
- Part of the same network as Winorama (also on this list), with around 12 sister casinos.

Winorama
Still operating: avoidOur score: 3.1/10
We rate it 3.1/10 ("Very low"): the same network and terms as Gratorama, including a €500-a-month withdrawal cap.
- Our safety score: 3.1/10 ("Very low").
- Sister brand of Gratorama (also on this list), with the same €500-a-month withdrawal cap and terms that allow winnings to be confiscated for low-risk play.

Wins Royal
Still operating: avoidOur score: 3.7/10
We rate it 3.7/10; unresolved public complaints include an account suspended at a 1,000 USDT withdrawal with support silent for 9+ days, and a withdrawal pending since October 2025.
- Our safety score: 3.7/10 ("Low").
- 10 public complaints, several unresolved.
- Cases on file: account suspended after attempting a 1,000 USDT withdrawal (support then silent for 9+ days); a withdrawal pending since October 2025 with unresponsive support.

Park Lane Casino
Still operating: avoidOur score: 3.9/10
We rate it 3.9/10 ("Low") and advise players to avoid it: 3 direct public complaints sit on the record.
- Our safety score: 3.9/10 ("Low"). We advise players to avoid it.
- 3 direct public complaints on the public record.

Sons of Slots
Still operating: avoidOur score: 4.3/10
We rate it 4.3/10 and advise players to refrain from using this casino: withdrawal delays, winnings confiscation and non-responsive support run through its complaint record.
- Our safety score: 4.3/10 ("Low"). Refrain from using this casino.
- 7 direct public complaints (checked 14 October 2026). Themes: withdrawal delays, winnings confiscation, non-responsive support.

UcoBet
Still operating: avoidOur score: 4.6/10
We rate it 4.6/10; an unresolved €1,400 refused withdrawal sits on the public record with the casino never answering mediation, operating on a Costa Rica "licence" that offers no player protection.
- Our safety score: 4.6/10 ("Low").
- Unresolved case on file: a €1,400 withdrawal refused (from its Jungliwin predecessor), with no response to complaint mediation.
- Operates on a Costa Rica registration: effectively no player protection or licensing oversight.

Horus Casino
Still operating: avoidOur score: 4.8/10
Unresolved withdrawal complaints on public mediation platforms, terms we judge unfair, and non-payment complaints from its own affiliates.
- Our safety score: 4.8/10, with terms we judge unfair.
- Unresolved on public complaint records (checked 14 October 2026): €3,000 of a €5,000 July 2026 win still unpaid, a €2,000 withdrawal refused, and €3,398 confiscated over a bonus-abuse claim.
- Its affiliate program (Moonshine Partners, which also runs Haz, Vegaz and Kryptosino) faces non-payment complaints from affiliates.
- Operates under an Anjouan (Comoros) licence (owner: Moonseeker SRL): no meaningful player recourse.

Loki Casino
Still operating: avoidOur score: 2.6/10
We rate it 2.6/10 (Very low): confiscated winnings, a win cap that voids most of what you win, and an Anjouan licence. An independent mediator scores it 3.3/10 and tells players to stay away.
- Operator Bets Entertainment N.V. (the brand was previously run by Dama N.V.); licence Anjouan (Comoros) ALSI-202410047-FI2, a regime with no player-fund protection or binding dispute body.
- Public complaint record, checked 14 October 2026: 6,019 USDT in winnings confiscated, still unresolved; a delayed €1,540 withdrawal and £4,900 in winnings were paid only after players filed complaints.
- Bonus terms cap winnings at €50 on no-deposit offers and at 10x the deposit otherwise: deposit €20, hit a big win, and the casino keeps everything above €200.
- An independent complaint mediator rates it 3.3/10 ("Very low") and explicitly advises players to stay away, counting 24,590 complaint points against Loki and its sister brands.
- Earlier public cases include withdrawals of about 9,000 held for days and 800 PLN chased for three months before payment.

Nomini
Still operating: avoidOur score: 3.4/10
We rate it 3.4/10: withdrawals stalled for weeks on verified accounts, accounts closed after cash-out requests with balances confiscated, a permanently closed account reopened, and no licence disclosed anywhere on the site.
- On 27 September 2026 nomini.com showed no licence, regulator or company name in its footer. Industry records list the owner as Naale Limited (earlier Araxio Development N.V., then Rabidi N.V. and Stellar Ltd) and an Anjouan (Comoros) licence, ALSI-202411077-FI2.
- Public complaints from 2025–2026: a €1,000 payout delayed on a fully verified account and €421 requested on 27 August 2026 (both paid only after complaints were filed); €500 requested on 24 June 2025 and $500 won on 16 June 2025 delayed; €310 stuck since 11 August 2025 after three re-submissions; 2,000 PLN delayed until a complaint was filed.
- An account closed after a withdrawal request (€800, settled after a complaint) and an account closed with its €624 balance confiscated.
- A permanently closed account was reopened despite the closure (€700 in dispute), a responsible-gambling failure.
- An independent complaint mediator scores it 5.9/10 ("Below average", under its own safe-and-fair line), with 26,317 complaint points counted against Nomini itself.
These casinos no longer operate in their original form, but their history stays relevant: closure does not erase unpaid balances, regulator action or documented complaints, and keeping the names on record helps you recognise them if they reappear under another operator or domain. If a site is using one of these names today, it is not the original casino: treat it as an impostor.
When a casino closes, its old domain can later be sold or reused by an unrelated business. If a former casino domain is active again, do not assume the original operator has returned: check the company name, licence details and ownership before entering personal or payment information.

Ding Ding Ding
Closed · April 2025Our score: 1.5/10
Stopped paying sweeps redemptions in March–April 2025, was publicly blacklisted by industry watchdogs, faced a class action, then vanished: the dead domain later redirected to an offshore crypto casino.
- Player redemptions stopped being paid around March–April 2025; multiple public complaints (e.g. $680 and $200 redemptions) remain unresolved on mediation platforms.
- Industry watchdogs publicly blacklisted the site on April 4, 2025, reporting it had stopped paying both partners and players.
- A class action against the operator (Living Pixels Studio LLC) was filed in Napa County, California in early 2025.
- The domain later went dark; for a time it redirected visitors to an offshore crypto casino, and on 14 October 2026 it did not load at all. Do not deposit anywhere a dingdingding.com link takes you.

Cresus Casino
Closed · October 2025Our score: 2.2/10
France's regulator ANJ ordered ISPs to block it (June 2024), citing numerous reports of unpaid winnings; French prosecutors later dismantled the operation, arresting two executives on illegal-gambling and money-laundering charges.
- On 20 June 2024 the French regulator ANJ ordered internet providers to block cresuscasino.com, citing "numerous reports from people who do not receive their winnings" and warning of payment fraud and data-theft risk.
- The operator dodged the block via mirror domains (cresus-casinos.com), triggering further ANJ blocking orders.
- In October 2025 French prosecutors arrested two executives, charged with running illegal gambling as an organized gang and money laundering; the Paris prosecutor put the casino’s turnover at nearly €1bn since 2021.
- The site shut down for good around October 2025 with players cut off from accounts. ANJ has no power to force an offshore operator to refund balances.

Power Spins
Closed · Late 2021Our score: 3.2/10
Closed after the UK Gambling Commission suspended operator BGO Entertainment's licence (15 October 2021) over consumer-protection concerns; BGO surrendered the licence a week later, and the old domain is now an impostor site.
- The UKGC suspended BGO Entertainment's operating licence on 15 October 2021, citing concerns including consumer-protection failures; the notice named powerspins.com among BGO's sites.
- BGO surrendered its UKGC licence on 22 October 2021 and its Alderney licence by 31 December 2021; all group brands closed. Players were permitted to withdraw during the wind-down, though some reported unresolved balances.
- BGO had prior regulatory history: a £300,000 advertising penalty (2017) and a £2m regulatory settlement (2020) for social-responsibility and AML failures.
- powerspins.co.uk today is an unrelated impostor posing as an "official" Power Spins casino. The real brand has been dead since 2021. Do not enter details there.

7Casino
Closed · February 2022Our score: 3.2/10
A BGO Entertainment brand that died with the group: the UKGC suspended BGO's licence in October 2021 over consumer-protection concerns, the licences were surrendered, and 7Casino was recorded closed in February 2022.
- Operated by BGO Entertainment under its Alderney licence for players outside the UK. BGO's UKGC licence was suspended on 15 October 2021 and surrendered on 22 October 2021; the Alderney licence followed by year-end and all brands closed.
- 7Casino was recorded closed in February 2022.
- Any site currently using the 7Casino name is not the original BGO casino.

Doggo Casino
Closed · February 2024Our score: 3.5/10
Vanished in early 2024 with no notice to players or affiliates: portals delisted it for being unresponsive. No orderly wind-down, no announcement, just gone.
- Doggo Casino was marked closed in February 2024; portals delisted it because the site stopped responding to players and affiliates with no warning or stated reason.
- A Curaçao brand (R&B Innovations N.V.): when such a casino goes silent there is no regulator to escalate to.
- Fairness note: the public complaint record shows two sizeable pre-closure complaints were resolved with payouts; the failure here is the silent disappearance, not a documented pattern of theft.

Hejgo Casino
Closed · November 2024Our score: 3.0/10
Closed November 2024; complaint platforms terminated its listing for being unresponsive, and players reported withheld deposits and dead-end support before the end.
- Hejgo (an N1 Interactive MGA brand) closed in November 2024 and no longer operates.
- Complaint mediators stopped handling its cases because the casino no longer responded.
- Pre-closure player complaints included deposits withheld for around two weeks and dead-end automated support.

StreamBetz
Closed · January 2025Our score: 2.7/10
Blacklisted by industry watchdogs in August 2024 for unethical business practices; public complaint platforms terminated its listing as unresponsive; its owner group (Winzon) is blacklisted elsewhere for chronic payment delays.
- Industry watchdogs blacklisted StreamBetz for unethical business practices and marked it closed in August 2024; the closure was recorded industry-wide by January 2025.
- Complaint platforms terminated its listing as unresponsive.
- A documented public complaint shows a player's self-exclusion failed to apply across Winzon sister sites. The casino claimed cross-brand self-exclusion was "technically impossible".
- The owner group, Winzon Group Ltd, has a documented record of consistent payment delays across its casinos; sister brand Winzon Casino was likewise terminated as unresponsive on complaint platforms.
- On 7 April 2026 the Malta Gaming Authority cancelled Winzon Group Limited's licence (effective 11 March 2026), ordered it to refund player money and imposed €147,080 in penalties.

CoinKings
Closed · June 2026Our score: 1.6/10
Shut without notice in June 2026 while player disputes were still open (confiscated balances, a stuck 12,017 USDT withdrawal and two ignored self-exclusion cases) and the brand has not reappeared.
- Operated from 2023 on coinkings.io by Igloo Ventures SRL (San José, Costa Rica) under an Anjouan (Comoros) licence, ALSI-1423 1005-FI2, not the Curaçao licence its pages implied. As late as 1 May 2026 the main domain was routing visitors to a mirror at coinkings777.com.
- In June 2026 the casino closed to new and existing players without explanation; neither domain has served the casino since, and the brand had not reappeared under any entity when we checked on 27 September 2026.
- Disputes still open on public complaint platforms when the site went dark: a 12,017 USDT withdrawal delayed with support unresponsive, an account closed with €1,500 confiscated, and confiscated winnings of $5,862 and €7,000.
- Two responsible-gambling failures on record: a German player with a network-wide self-exclusion told the casino of his addiction on 22 August 2024, kept being allowed to deposit, and only had the account closed after his eighth request (€2,500 dispute); a separate $11,400 dispute concerns play allowed despite self-exclusion.
How a casino ends up on this list
We only blacklist a brand when the primary record supports it: unresolved player complaints our team has verified on public mediation platforms, formal regulator or court action, or documented non-payment. A low rating alone is not enough, and ending a commercial relationship never puts a casino here. If you have evidence a listed casino has made things right, or that another casino belongs here, contact us. See our rating methodology for how the scores work. You can also cross-check any casino's current offer and licensing data on our sister site check.casino, where listings are re-verified on a rolling schedule.
If a casino on this list (or any UK site) is sitting on your withdrawal, don't stop at live chat. The UK complaints escalation guide on our sister project walks the ladder that actually gets results: the operator's eight-week window, free ADR adjudication, and what the Gambling Commission will and won't handle.
What counts as evidence
Regulator or court action, repeated non-payment, unresolved complaints documented through recognised mediation services, serious responsible-gambling failures or a consistent pattern of unfair treatment. Where a casino is still operating we say so; closed casinos are listed separately.
Regulatory action
Regulatory action carries significant weight. Where a regulator has issued a fine, suspension, prohibition or licence revocation, we explain what happened, when, and whether the decision is final, under appeal or still being challenged. An allegation is not treated the same way as a confirmed regulatory decision.
Player complaints
Individual complaints do not put a casino here. We look for patterns: repeated non-payment, confiscated balances, ignored withdrawal requests, failed self-exclusion, unexplained account closures or several complaints describing the same behaviour, and we distinguish unresolved allegations from cases backed by regulator decisions, court records or established mediation platforms.
A note on offshore licences
An offshore licence does not automatically make a casino unsafe, but the level of player protection varies a lot between regulators. Some offshore regulators now run formal complaints and independent dispute-resolution procedures; those protections still differ from a UK Gambling Commission or Malta Gaming Authority licence, so we look at the casino's conduct as well as the licence it holds. Anjouan, for example, now requires its licensees to follow a formal complaints process: the casino has up to 30 days to respond, and an unresolved complaint can then go to an approved independent dispute-resolution provider. That is a route for complaints, but the framework remains lighter than in the major European jurisdictions.
Before you deposit
A casino does not need to appear on this list to carry risk. Before depositing, check who operates the site, whether its licence can be verified on the regulator's own register, what its withdrawal rules say and whether there is a clear complaints process. Unusually high bonuses, unclear ownership, missing licence information and complicated withdrawal terms are all reasons to look more closely first.